Former President Olusegun Obasanjo recently called for a credible leadership for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to ensure election integrity in Nigeria. While the statement aligns with the critical need for credible elections in the country, it raises questions about the messenger’s own credibility.
Obasanjo, once described by Nobel Laureate Prof. Wole Soyinka as a “pathological liar, predator, and sadist,” has a controversial political legacy that includes his infamous "do-or-die" approach to elections. His tenure as president and his post-office interventions have often been marred by allegations of electoral manipulation and authoritarian tendencies. For many, Obasanjo’s call for integrity feels ironic, given his history of undermining democratic processes.
The former president’s role in the 2003 and 2007 elections, widely criticized for irregularities, continues to haunt his democratic credentials. These elections were marked by voter intimidation, ballot box snatching, and outright manipulation. Such actions have left many questioning whether Obasanjo has the moral authority to advocate for electoral reform.
That said, Obasanjo’s call for credible leadership in INEC cannot be entirely dismissed. It reflects a shared concern among Nigerians about the declining integrity of the electoral process. However, the messenger's past actions cast a shadow over the message itself. To some, it appears hypocritical, while to others, it could be a rare moment of reflection or an attempt to reshape his legacy.
Ultimately, Nigeria's quest for credible elections demands contributions from all, irrespective of past misdeeds. However, genuine change must be driven by leaders who not only preach integrity but also exemplify it in their actions. For Obasanjo, the path to redemption lies not in rhetoric but in acknowledging and addressing the undemocratic actions of his past.
Comments
Post a Comment