Who leads Nigeria? In nominal terms,
President Muhammadu Buhari is, having first been produced in 2015 by a
largely-credible election.
In practice, however, it has become
increasingly clear that Nigeria has no leadership. In five years, Buhari has
disappeared deep into the vapours of power.
By comparison, his predecessor,
Goodluck Jonathan was equally inept, but Mr. Jonathan had a few people around
him who neither worshipped nor were afraid of him. Jonathan swam—and
reportedly drank—like a fish, but he did so in shallow waters.
Buhari, we now know, does not know
how to swim, and does not wear a navigation aid. But he appears to
believe that if he drifts long enough in the open sea and shouts loudly enough,
someone will come along.
In Buhari’s hands, Nigeria is walking
backward. That is why the most prominent public official is now Abba
Kyari, a personal appointee of the president and holder of an office that is
unknown to the constitution.
As though Chief of Staff Kyari was
not sufficiently disruptive in Buhari’s first term, the president began his
second by subordinating members of his cabinet to him.
In this schema, a Minister can still
see the President, but first, he must go to the Chief of Staff and answer one
question: “Why?”
That is how Kyari became the nation’s
defining figure: the authority figure Buhari was unwilling, and apparently
incapable, of being.
Last week, so complete became the
Kyari ascendancy that National Security Adviser (NSA) Babagana Munguno did not
attend the latest of those banal meetings of security chiefs Buhari summons
daily to give the impression of leadership.
They gave the excuse that the retired
general was representing Buhari at a security meeting abroad. Think about
it: with Nigeria on the verge of collapse, there was a meeting for the NSA that
was far more important than Nigeria’s security!
The answer is in a memo Mungono had
authored early in December in which he drove his stake into the ground,
directing the nation’s service chiefs to stop accepting directives from Kyari.
In the strongest terms, he decried Kyari’s meddlesomeness, saying they
“ruptured our security and defence efforts…”
The memo, which leaked last month,
seemed to explain the growing insecurity nationwide response. The NSA accused
Kyari of issuing directives to service chiefs sometimes without the knowledge
or approval of the president. Kyari] is not a presiding head of security,
neither is he sworn to an oath of defending the country,” the retired general
explained, affirming that the activities of the Chief of Staff violated the
constitution and undermined Buhari’s authority.
The memo unveiled a government in
disarray, with different nodes of authority and responsibility—and
presumptuousness—but also Buhari’s nonchalance and complicity.
Nonchalance and complicity do not a
leader define.
But Buhari’s response? Silence.
It was the same response in 2018 when his wife cried out that two people
had taken her husband’s government from him.
She had further lashed out at some
shadowy others: “I am disappointed in men who rather than fight these two men
will go to them in the night begging for favour.”
Her husband delivered that robust
indifference. He did not seek to reassure his government or the people.
And he has not done so now, at
Nigeria’s most insecure and dangerous point since the civil war.
As this column has demonstrated in
the past few years, Buhari has now saddled Nigeria with a government which
claims it knows what security is but has delivered insecurity instead.
He has delivered even worse on the
economy, where unimplemented pledges and plans, along with chaotic policies,
half-policies and pseudo-policies have boosted unemployment and crime.
Consider, for example, that the Trader Moni scheme which preceded the
2019 election has disappeared.
Buhari has delivered his worst
performance on the anti-corruption file, where his words have been exposed for
their emptiness and corrupt elements run the show and are running
unchallenged.
Again and again, Buhari and his
worshippers have assured the nation of their victory over Boko Haram, but each
time the government has been embarrassed as the militants have returned to
wreak havoc not just on civilians, but on soldiers.
Only last July, the Wall Street
Journal reported how the government has lied to Nigerians about how the war is
going with a pattern of secret burials of soldiers in such places as Maimalari,
near Maiduguri.
“After dark, the bodies of soldiers
are covertly transported from a mortuary that at times gets so crowded the
corpses are delivered by truck, according to Nigerian soldiers, diplomats and a
senior government official. The bodies are laid by flashlight into trenches dug
by infantrymen or local villagers paid a few dollars per shift,” it said.
“Several of my comrades were buried
in unmarked graves at night,” one soldier of the Maimalari Barracks told the
newspaper, adding, “They are dying and being deleted from history.”
This pattern of deceptiveness and
manipulation, where performance and productivity are far easier and cheaper to
deliver sadly defines the Buhari Era.
Leadership is when the leader can
define what a problem and what is being done about it, including adjustments to
policy. For Buhari, power was the objective and is the end. Even
after five years, cannot demonstrate his grasp of, or response to any Nigerian
challenge.
At best, he presents stock clichés as
solutions, and indifference as eloquence. There is nothing to which
Buhari is so committed or passionate that he has clarity or staying power. That
is why Kyari is in control. Nigeria’s problems are not worse despite
Buhari’s efforts, they are worse because of Buhari.
That is why Buhari is not fighting
insecurity; Buhari—by his indifference and incompetence, to which NSA Munguno
alludes—is insecurity. Buhari is not fighting corruption; he is protecting
and promoting corruption.
Nigeria is therefore not just an army
without a leader, it is an army with no sight. Under his watch, leaders of the
federal legislature leaders are now extending to themselves the forbidden fruit
of immunity. In effect, the same party which said it would combat
impunity by reducing immunity is multiplying one by the other.
But a country without a leader has no
future. That is why patriotic media and citizen groups should take a cue
from the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project and take the fight to
governments and government institutions through the law. The Freedom of
Information law is begging to be used, and it is a shame that the mass media is
not using it.
Where are you, Public Accountability
League? Where are you, The Patriots? Where are you, Public Interest
Lawyers League?
This vacuum must not last.
SONALA OLUMHENSE
SYNDICATED
Comments
Post a Comment