The unbridled beatification of Mallam
Abba Kyari, who succumbed to Covid-19 disease on Saturday, April 18th, exemplifies
the strange inability of the present administration’s members to own up to
mistakes and accept correction. Yet, as friends and colleagues decorated
Kyari’s head with a saint’s halo, they could not justify why they termed him
“the best of us”.
What
have they said about the way Abba Kyari faced his duties? Nothing! Obadiah
Mailafia in the Tuesday April 21st Vanguard called Abba Kyari “the most
powerful Chief of Staff our country has ever known”, a de-facto Prime Minister.
In the next paragraph, he said that “posterity would judge” whether Kyari was
effective or not” in serving his principal or for his “self-aggrandizement.”
That Buhari called him the Best of us” should make us rethink his
contributions though! Buhari’s tribute remains the best so far: “Working,
without fail, seven days each and every week, he acted forcefully as a crucial
gatekeeper to the presidency, ensuring no one – whether minister or governor
had access beyond another – and that all those representing and serving our
country were treated equally. He made clear in his person and his practice,
always, that every Nigerian – regardless of faith, family, fortune, or frailty
– was heard and treated respectfully and the same. Mallam Abba Kyari was the
very best of us. He was made of the stuff that makes Nigeria great. Rest In
Peace, my dearest friend”. Buhari made no superhuman claims for Kyari, his
words were measured, restrained and touching. I felt his pain.
Mailafia offered one rare insight;
Kyari, “like Rasputin, never wasted an opportunity to amass ever greater and
greater power and accoutrements that went with it” because nature arbours
“vacuum”. And I ask, where exactly was the vacuum? Was it in the
Vice-President’s office? No, is the answer because every time Vice-President
Yemi Osinbajo acted for Buhari, people usually applauded him. That vacuum could
not have been in the National Security Adviser’s Office because the NSA,
General Mohammed Babagana Mongono, accused him of meddling in his duties and
watering down the anti-Boko Haram fight, thus betraying Nigeria. The only
person, who didn’t complain was the President, though the First Lady whined.
It is instructive that Mailafia, in all seriousness, likened Kyari to
Rasputin, who mesmerised the Russian Tsar Nicholas Romanov and his Czarina
Alexandra, and thereby acquired and abused much powers. I don’t know if
Mailafia knew that Rasputin was nicknamed the devil because many thought he was
demonic.
Refreshingly, Is’haq Modibbo Kawu’s
testimonial:“Mallam Abba Kyari: Brother, Friend, Patriot”, was insightful; he
was well read and bought books for friends as Waziri Adio and Simoen Kolawole
had said. But he dug deeper into Abba Kyari’s life; he used to accompany the
man to Mallam Mamman Daura’s “residence where a small crowd of distinguished
Northern Nigerian technocrats used to gather for the mandatory cup of evening
tea, small chops and the discussion about the state of the nation”. From
Kawu’s other writings I have little reason to doubt that such discussions
rested on the interest of the North as against that of the South. Kawu has
always seen Nigeria from North versus South lenses.
So,
would I be wrong to conclude that such discussions may have endeared Kawu to
Kyari and Daura? If not, how would the Aso Rock where the same Mamman Daura and
Abba Kyari called the shots have been? In such an Aso Rock, the discussion that
used to be held in Daura’s house must have been upgraded from mere discussions
to the actualisation level!
Modibbo
Kawu was, until recently, the Director-General of the National Broadcasting
Commission (NBC). Just as controversy had trailed his tenure there, a
controversy that have led to his recent suspension from office and his being
arraigned in court on corruption charges by the Independent Corrupt Practices
and Other Related Offences Commission), so has controversy trailed Abba Kyari’s
tenure as Buhari’s Chief of Staff.
Kawo
once wrote in an article on Mamman Daura: “For me, what I found most admirable
about Malam Maman and his generation of elders, was the way that they retained
a loyalty, not only to themselves, but also to their elders and to the memory
of their earlier years of service to Northern Nigeria. It was something that I
noticed with the late Chief Sunday Awoniyi, the late Malam Adamu Ciroma,
Alhaji Adamu, Wazirin Fika; and that community of trust, I also witnessed with
the late Malam Yahaya Gusau. We were preparing for Maghrib prayers on a
Saturday evening, at Malam Mamman Daura’s residence, when Chief Sunday Awoniyi
was driven into the compound. There immediately formed, what resembled a mini
welcome party, as Dr. Mahmoud Tukur, Malam Mamman Daura, the younger Malam
Abba Kyari, and others, including this reporter, joined the cue to receive the
venerable Chief Awoniyi. ..In that moment, I saw a re-enactment of the
traditions of leadership and respect, which was the foundation upon which
service and social existence were constructed in the old Northern Nigeria. Of
course, these welled up nostalgia and deepened fascination for those times
past”.
Please, don’t misunderstand me; any
Nigerian has a right to think or reminisce about any part of Nigeria from Aba
to Zaria and Akure to Sokoto but we also know that a man must be a product of
his milieu. Perhaps, I need to define this term so as not to be misunderstood:
the Cambridge English Dictionary defines it as “the people, physical, and
social conditions and events that provide the environment in which someone
acts or lives”. Kawu’s milieu remains that of Northern Nigeria which ceased to
exist with the creation of 12 states in 1967. Was that Abba Kyari’s too? I hope
Kawu misunderstood him and Mamman Daura.
I
mentioned Kawu most responsibly, because his background and events surrounding
him contributed to give Kyari a bad name, and those who praise him need to go
further than they have so far and convince Nigerians that Nigerianness and
nothing but Nigerianness drove Kyari in all he did. I will use Kawu’s case (as
he stated it in an article) as an example. When this man who was born in 1960,
graduated from secondary school in 1976, became pioneer DG, of Kwara
Television in 1977 (that came from him, too) barely a year of his working with
Radio Nigeria (Nigerian Broadcasting Corporation) was appointed head of NBC in
2016, which regulates Broadcasting in Nigeria, he wrote, in a widely
publicised article of June 2nd of same year: “I come from a background of
scholars and public servants with a very proud tradition dating back into the
history of the empires of the old Western Sudan.” This includes the Savanna
and Sahel lands north of the West African tropical rainforest belt, the rivers
of the Senegal, Gambia and Niger systems, as well as the highlands of Fouta
Djallon from which these rivers flow, and up to the Lake Chad, as Wikipedia
shows. .
Resuming at NBC, Kawu had at the back
of his mind his uncle’s advice: ‘“Please ensure that you uphold our family name
and your own honour”! It is an admonishment that I have tried to truly live by
and it will still condition my attitude in the new position at the NBC. I will
work with dedication and give the best to our country as I know it, and will
also be true to the change-for-the-better, that President Muhammadu Buhari
represents and promotes for our country”.
Ah,
that All Progressives Congress’ change mantra! Then the allegations came
thick and fast: The ICPC in February 2019 filed a 12-count charge before a
judge, Folashade Ogunbanjo-Giwa, against Mr Kawu, Lucky Omoluwa, and Dipo
Onifade, the Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Pinnacle Communications
Limited respectively, for allegedly misappropriating N2.5 billion.
A
year later on 14th February, Kawu was suspended and should return to the NBC if
he is found innocent. Now, how does this impact on Kyari’s reputation? It
contrasts with the treatment of former Chief Justice of the Federation, Walter
Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen and the former Head of Service, Mrs Winnifred Oyo-Ita.
She, for instance, was suspended September 2019 but arraigned March 2020. In
fact, some people might even conclude that Modibbo Kawu was suspended just
before Mrs Winnifred Oyo-Ita was arraigned to deflect the expected criticism of
favouritism against the powers that be at Aso Rock. Unlike Oyo-Ita who was
suspended from office ever before she was arraigned, Kawu remained in office
for a year, despite having been arraigned, and despite the numerous calls for
his removal or suspension. In fact, if things have moved fast, a judgement
could have been delivered and Kawu would have remained in office all through
his trial.
Some have even reminded us of how Mrs.
Oyo Ita stood up to Kyari at a Federal Executive Council meeting over how
Abdulrasheed Maina was smuggled back into the Civil Service. An angry Oyo-Ita
nexplained she had warned of the implication of reinstating Mr Maina into the
civil service.
Please
note that I have not commented on the merits of the cases; those are left for
the courts. I have only referred to the different treatments both received
with regards to being allowed to remain in office while their cases lasted.
Now, would anyone blame anybody for concluding that Kyari must have protected
Kawu who was a close associate of his for years prior to his appointment?
How
much Abba Kyari reserved official appointments for his friends and acquaintances
has been exhibited. How much did this hurt or help the nation? A national
government is not supposed to be formed by a cult of friends, but by a wisely
assembled team, from diverse backgrounds, of those best able to advance the
national cause. And because of the unique nature of the Nigerian federation
and its weak unity, not yet totally healed from the effects of the civil war,
the idea of a Federal Character has been entrenched and obeyed by past
administrations. Buhari’s administration, driven by Kyari, the much-hailed
Caesar of our time, never cared a hoot about such. How a man with much vaunted
academic brilliance and common sense could not understand that such a stance
would rip the nation apart beats the imagination.
What remains is this: was he an
effective Chief of Staff ? All his supporters have said that he was fiercely
loyal to Buhari and that he was a highly intelligent workaholic. But did he
disturb the functions of the Vice-President? The NSA? The First Lady? Did he
even control the Ministers –supposed experienced leaders from around the
country who have some combination of executive experience, policy expertise,
partisan credentials, or personal loyalty to the President? Ministers are
supposed to represent presidential priorities, represent demographic groups and
marshal the support of the clientele of their ministries. Ministers, because
they are confirmed by the Senate, are officers of the state as opposed to mere
presidential aides; but did Kyari understand such fine points? Perhaps, I need
to educate some commentators about how the White House, and the Chief of Staff
too, acquired powers that it never controlled before during the President
Richard Nixon administration – and we all know that Nixon was disgraced out of
office.
Did
the insurgency in the land catch Kyari’s attention? Could the writers of the
Epic of Abba Kyari tell us how the man sacrificed and toiled to halt the menace
of killer herdsmen?
Sundry
friends of Kyari have been justifying the man’s octopus-like tentacles that
controlled everything in Nigeria, and likening it to how the American version
operates. That is a lie. The White House Chief of Staff oversees the Executive
Office of the President (EOP) of the United States. May the present distortion
not be copied by future administrations.
Comments
Post a Comment