Africa must
industrialise to create broad-based prosperity. To achieve this aim,
policymakers focus too heavily on getting more out of natural resources rather
than growing and applying knowledge, which is the real basis of economic
diversification and progress.
Africa's innovation strategies are at a
crossroads. The African Union's 10-year Science, Technology and Innovation in
Africa Strategy (STISA-2024) seek to reposition Africa as a technology-driven
economy, away from a supplier of raw materials for the global economy. To
resolve the tension between mineral dependency and innovation, policy makers
stress the importance of adding value to natural resources.
African
states should try to get the best possible deal for their resources and often
this will involve in-country value addition. At present, the continent's
commodity systems not only suffer from enormous Illicit Financial Flow
leakages, sucking money out of the continent and away from government treasuries,
but also tend to engage in the least profitable end of the value chain. For
example, in 2014 Africa exported $2.4 billion of coffee. Germany, which is not
a producer but a processor, re-exported nearly $3.8 billion worth of coffee.
The standard response to the disparity is to call on Africa to add value to its
coffee.
However,
value addition should not be the primary model for industrial diversification.
To give it that focus would be to ignore lessons from economic history and
tariffs imposed on African exports by trading partners.
For many of
the largest markets African states sell to, the tax charges are higher the more
refined the product is. So, it is expensive for countries to add value to their
exports unless they can convince trading partners to give them more beneficial
terms or find new trading partners.
Reducing or
removing tariff barriers would not automatically lead to value addition in
producer countries. Raw material exporters would need time to build up
processing capabilities. The temptation under such conditions is to enter into
joint ventures with importing country companies or to encourage them to set up
processing capabilities in the exporting countries. These policies may be
successful, but they may also give too much away to those foreign companies,
especially if the policy is erroneously seen as the route to industrialisation.
There is
little evidence to suggest that countries industrialise by adding value to
their raw materials. Rather, the causality runs the other way--countries add
value to raw materials because they already have the technological capacity to
do so.
Lagging behind
In fact,
commodity booms are often a consequence of policy incentives, improvements in
exploration technology and investment in commodity-related public research.
Africa currently lags far behind in such efforts, distracted by its mineral
wealth.
Africa's
most significant challenge is upgrading the competence of its people through
enhanced education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
Such
investments will enable the continent to develop the capacity to use the
world's available scientific and technical knowledge to diversify the economy.
This economic development will not be dependent on natural resources, although
they will likely play some role.
Let us look
a few inspirational examples. In the early 1960s, Taiwan was a leading mushroom
exporter. It quickly became a semiconductor powerhouse. It did not achieve this
through the benefication of mushrooms. In the 1990s, Finland dominated the
world market for mobile phones. This success was not achieved by adding value
to lumber, for which it was known. A decade later, Kenya's pioneering of mobile
money transfer owed nothing to value addition in its tea or coffee sectors. Brazil's
sugar was not the basis for the emergence of the country's aeronautical
prowess. China focused considerably on meeting the food needs of the people by
expanding rice production. But this was not the basis for its rise as a world
leader in solar photovoltaics. The secret of these countries lies in their
acquisition, domestication and expansion of local technological capabilities.
But even more importantly, these countries were able to identify emerging
technologies that could serve as a platform for producing a wide range of
products and associated services.
Technological
versatility is a critical element of product development. Some technologies
offer greater opportunity for product diversification than others. Diamonds are
not forever, but the knowledge underlying their structures might be.
Agricultural residue may appear valueless. But with modern knowledge on
nanotechnology and chemical engineering, such material could be the basis of
new biomaterials-based industries. Knowledge diversification offers countries
greater opportunities for creating new economic combinations.
For the most
successful combinations to arise, policymakers should be aware that
technological innovation is a recombinant process that builds on prior
knowledge. For example, as noted in this column last month, the 3D printing
industry - a possible dramatic growth sector that some young African
entrepreneurs are already exploiting--is an extension of the digital
revolution, but it also requires additional expertise in electronic, mechanical
and chemical engineering.
Pursuing
such strategies requires building up the capacity to identify, acquire and
domesticate emerging technologies. Such competence usually resides in science,
technology and engineering departments In universities and research institutes.
In fact, most African nations already possess pockets of such capabilities in
their institutions of higher learning and research. But their governments
hardly know about their existence, partly because of their preoccupation with
raw material exports and appeals for foreign assistance.
Secrets of
industrial diversification
Africa's
economic transformation through innovation is within reach. But this cannot be
effectively pursued while continuing to be hobbled by the untenable view that
industrial diversification needs to start with adding value to the continent's
materials.
But, this
should be done as an end in itself, not as the mechanism for spurring
industrial development. To industrialise, policymakers should focus on the
knowledge underlying industrial products and processes. With such knowledge,
African countries may, in fact, find opportunities for increasing its
manufactured exports that are not necessarily related to their natural resource
endowments.
It is partly
because of the limited investment in technological competence that Africa has
hardly been able to benefit from trade arrangements such as America's Africa
Growth Opportunity (AGOA). Similarly, Africa's exports to new markets such
China are still very low despite the removal of tariffs and duty on a wide
range of products. The same obstacles face intra-African trade, which remains
small.
Raw
materials are an important part of Africa's past, present and future. However,
they are not the most strategic entry point for industrial diversification and
job creation. Instead, we should place direct focus on upgrading human
competence.
Raw
materials are exhaustible, human knowledge grows with use. That is the secret
of industrial diversification, job creation and prosperity.
Comments
Post a Comment